These people aren’t all Wannabe’s; some of them ARE Indians or Metis in Canada and the U.S.!
These people aren’t all Wannabe’s; some of them ARE Indians or Metis in Canada and the U.S.!
Is this unprecedented?!! Even the corrupt Supremes threw the case out unanimously, ie, even the Republican ones, yet the Bushies aren’t taking No for an answer. Is this a case of “How many legions has the Supreme Court”? Will they have to send over a unit of U.S. Marshals to inhibit the White House from abetting the theft of this election? Take command of the Secret Service? Do they have the stones?!
Unbelievable but true in this day and age, the harassers learned nothing from the ’50s and ’60s except that Southern Democrats were done with that sort of thing. Really desperate. They show their true colors … and I haven’t heard McSame/Failin’ disavow them. IIUC this kind of harassment is a crime, a violation of voters’ civil, legal, constitutional, and human rights … and the police do nothing — just like the cops who it seems were complicit in helping suppress turnout in 2000 and ’04 by blocking streets near polling places in Black neighborhoods, etc.
What could be scarier?: The idea that these people seek to enforce their belief that “Sundays are for church, not voting,” on the rest of us — by mob-rule yet! There is no legally-established religion in the United States, and hasn’t been since before the Civil War. People are free to make of Sundays or any other day of the week what they will as long as it’s legal.
Speaking of disavowals, I had forgotten that McCain “pals around with” wannabe-terrorist G. Gordon Liddy (text-search his name among the Comments on the linked page).
“Yup, Yup,” it’s clear what Repugs mean when they talk about democracy and “traditional values”: Jim Crow, exclusion of people of color, or rather, of anybody who disagrees with them. Just like the “Founding Fathers” did! McCain is even willing to lie — or didn’t know, either way, it’s profoundly disturbing in a wannabe-President — about the scheduling of the last innings of the World Series, on which he chooses to attack Obama. “You betcha, doggone it!”
They’re a paid bit(?) on The CBS Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson, pushing “the new Ford Flex,” a supposed Scottish hip-hop group — the Highlanderz, not the Flex — featuring Craig’s “cousins Angus [himself] and Philip Ferguson,” and a cute Black woman who sometimes speaks Scottish-English and sometimes American — “Aye!” It’s inspired lunacy. Tonight (Thursday / early AM Friday) they aired a whole music video — adding a couple backup dancers — based on the “We Are the Highlanderz” ditty which is all you can hear on the website for the moment.
It’s over, Hornymanatee.com….
Bubbles, marry me!!! (Love the hat!) “We are the Highlanderz, mighty and strong, We’re packing so much heat that our kilts are extra long!”
Of course, if we’re to take this writer seriously, maybe we shouldn’t even take him seriously!
All the subtle(?) racism, all the “Terrorist!”, all the “socialist,” all the “dishonorable,” all the “Kill him!” and all the other mud…. Are they surprised some people in this country take them up on it?! Maybe they really wouldn’t mind….
The MSM keeps saying that the latest GOP talking point — to keep Democrats from controlling “every branch of government” * — is an appeal to independent voters. But that’s ridiculous, because the GOP was certainly OK with single-party control of ALL THREE BRANCHES 2000-2006! (Not counting the Reagan, Bush I, and Clinton [sic] administrations, and fake Democrats in Congress all along!!)
No, this is really just more “red meat for the base.” I think they’re afraid the “base” will stay home with all the polls pointing to a Democratic sweep of the Executive and Legislative Branches … so this is to make sure they come out even if McCain/Palin look like they’re losing, to try to keep Congress at least. Independents certainly aren’t interested in single-party control of ALL THREE BRANCHES again!
Nevermind that it looks like the national Republican Party seems to be splintering, McCain’s campaign now professing doubt they’ll (re)take Congress, and Congressional candidates doubting they’ll retain the White House. Watch for them to turn their daggers on each other/eat their young in these final days.
Speaking of talking points, how come the MSM keep playing the same tired McSame/Failin’ lies without contradicting them with objective research? When the Nazis did this, it was the Big Lie Strategy — keep saying it till the people believe it. “He said/she said” political coverage isn’t journalism, just PR!
(*–Last time I checked, the Supreme Court wasn’t up in this election, and was still firmly in Repug control … unless they think President Obama will try to pull an FDR and threaten to nominate extra Justices to the Court! [There's an idea...!])
…according to several stories I read on my phone while IBS’ing in a supermarket bathroom last night. (On a related note, Donna Brazile tells it like it is!)
And the Repugs have so little confidence in their Indiana Jim Crow voter-i.d. law that they want to play judicial games now? Disingenuous. “Dishonorable.”
But PLEASE, don’t let them suppress your vote. Go. Vote. Take or borrow a cell phone. If they try to make trouble for you, go to http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/vpcreport and tell the Obama campaign about it IMMEDIATELY. UPDATED Sun 2 November: And/Or call the nonpartisan Election Protection coalition — http://www.866ourvote.org/ – toll-free at 1-866-OUR-VOTE, and/or use their website to report “glitches.” Call the number for you LOCAL Democratic Party in the phone book and tell them. Call the local TV and radio news departments. If you have a liberal radio talk show in your market, call them too.
I swear, the Democrats better not leave GOP shenanigans to the Greens and Libertarians THIS time!
So suggests this article. But watch the GOP scream “voter fraud” if it happens!
So whose alleged inexperience to you fear more behind the big desk in the Oval Office: the United States Senator from Illinois, who’s lived abroad, served the community, taught law, and labored in the U.S. Senate? Or the most recent mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, “a town with fewer people than the bleacher section at Wrigley Field”?!?!?!
They charge Democrats and our supporters are stealing the election, and sue us? That’s rich, and a classic case of misdirection, like sleight-of-hand magicians, considering McCain and the Republicans are publicly in the process of trying to prevent millions of us Democrats, poor, people of color, students, Blue-Staters, city residents, etc., from voting – AND privately, most assuredly rigging the e-voting machines or e-counting machines for good measure. These are all repeats from 2000 and 2004, and possibly ’02 and ’06 too.
Lately we’re hearing that racist voters might lie to pollsters about their willingness, or not, to vote for Obama, excusing a discrepancy between pre-election surveys and the reported results or exit polls. Is the re-surfacing of talk about this “Bradley Effect” preparing us for another stealth coup d’etat? Nevermind that there might not have even been a Bradley Effect! Los Angeles mayor Tom Bradley, a Black man, ran for Governor of California in 1982, and led going into Election Day, but lost, inspiring this Bradley Effect theory. But some analysts I’ve read (I can’t locate where now) say that since both his lead and his defeat were within the polls’ margin of error, the Effect may be an illusion. So beware allegations of an Obama Effect in coming weeks before and after Election Day! It’ll be like in Ohio in ’04, when we were told that Republican voters intentionally lied to pollsters or refused to respond, producing the “glitch” that seemed to say W. carried that State’s election results, and the whole enchilada. Was John Kerry Black?!?!?!
(Reminds me of the line in The Commitments about a Dublin, Ireland, soul band: “The Irish are the Blacks of Europe. Dubliners are the Blacks of Ireland. Northsiders are the Blacks of Dublin. So say it loud: I’m Black and I’m proud!“)
MY reason is I’m tired of the W. abuses of power and neutered or compromised Congresses’ lax oversight, and compromised Republican courts.
The dirty little secret is that usually the party out of power Federally favors States’ Rights where they ARE in power, or hope to use to regain power, and opposed by the party IN power Federally that wants to impose its will nationally, and finds it easier to do so through one government than 50, 51, or 52! They don’t always use the language of States’ Rights, though. Because the phrase has been tainted by racists, slaveholders, and Confederates, I prefer State Sovereignty — an absolute value under the current Constitution.
I’ve admired the late Marc Chaitlin, but he underestimated the need for State Sovereignty. Suffice to say he passed away during W.’s first 100 days. It’s possible to see our States today as Chaitlin’s mere “state-like provinces,” and as theologian Stanley Hauerwas might say, there’s no denying the descriptive power of that statement. But we need to restore States’ dignity as a hedge against Federal dictatorship like we’ve experienced now, or worse in the future. Certainly not to roll back true progressive improvements in America, or give greater power to reactionary elements among State and local politicians … indeed, to protect or restore those improvements, and make them even better! Actually I think most Americans today think of States as little more than provinces, pointless holdovers from somewhere around the Middle Ages, with non-understood differences in drinking or driving laws, court systems, governmental structures, tax structures, practices — Patriots’ Day? Freeholders? I&R? California Emission? But all this proves is the need to fix Civics classes, and educate pundits and journalists also. (While we’re at it, let’s teach about the legal status of Native American Tribes, and their rights and Reservations / Villages also.)
GOP dirty tricks are once again in high gear. “There you go again!”
Think about it: Technically the Democratic and Republican parties aren’t national parties, but State parties. The U.S. has no nationally-elected officials; even Presidential Electors are elected State-by-State (which is why the national popular vote total doesn’t matter under the current constitution). However, because all the State Democratic parties act like a national party, as do all the State Republican parties, the President of the Executive Branch becomes their national leader, subordinating his fellow-partisans in Congress and even, as we’ve seen in recent years, in the Federal Courts and “independent” Federal agencies.
Supposedly it wasn’t supposed to be this way. The Federalist Papers claim to be incapable of envisioning such a nationwide, multi-region, multi-State “cabal” as a national political party (“faction” was another word they called it; “party” only came into use later), because of the presumed clashes of local and regional interests. But long ago our elections of Presidential Electors were “nationalized,” relegating “sectional” interests to Congress. This therefore also subordinates the States, which are supposed to be co-sovereign with the Federal government, and a check on Federal overreaching like we’ve seen so much of in the last 7+ years.
It all goes toward making the President of the Executive Branch the virtual dictator he is today … or can be if he’s allowed to be by those who are supposed to stop him.
What’s the solution? Bar State parties from jointly endorsing candidates? Even within States with a semblance of a multi-party system — such as New York, with its Democratic, Republican, Liberal, Conservative, and Right-to-Life parties — you often have cross-endorsement, and sometimes it makes the difference in the outcome — typically Republicans courting also the C and RTL ballot lines, and Democrats the L (though Liberal there means Classical Liberal, not liberal like you’re thinking).
What about going back to actually electing Electors, real persons of weight whom we entrust to pick the best person for the job? Make the Electoral College a real collegium and not just a party-hack rubber-stamp for one or the other major declared and nominated candidate?
Like the U.S. Senate elected not by the voters but by State legislators — and for many of the same reasons – could it be that the “Framers” were sometimes smarter than I thought?!!!
Please, you guys, Ayers / Wright is so old, learn a new tune, eh? Either they don’t have much else to push on us, or they think just getting out their “base” will be enough on Election Day. What do they know that we don’t? Is it already “in the bag,” like 2000 and ’04?!!! Election integrity, please!!! And watch those polls from here on in for fudging both by pollsters and MSM.
Electoral College tally based on said polls looks good for America so far! Remember it’s the Electors who elect … and we elect them.
Palin going to court … or so it looks, in connection with her “unlawful abuse of power” in Troopergate and possibly other matters. It seems Wooten and Monegan want their reputations back, or just compensation. It’s nice to see politicians being held accountable for their personal lies and abuses once in a blue moon! I think if public figures defended their good names in court more, it might help clean-up our political discourse, which has been in the gutter since Reagan / Falwell / Robertson. NOW I bet we’ll find out the meaning of IS!!!
De jure 44th President of the United States John Kerry isn’t just a hockey parent, he PLAYS hockey. Did Comcast ever have him drop the puck at a Philadelphia Flyers game back in ’04? It’s just Big Business, corporations, and Republican partisanship.
Not taking sides in the Cherokee Freedmen controversy because I don’t know enough about it … still, see the two pages-images from the Tribe’s advertising at this Wikipedia article!
Or even the front page of the American Indian College Fund site: The masthead image at top including a student, rotates among four different folks, one an Irish-looking young lady (except her eyes). Red hair and turquoise, best of both worlds!
Or this 2005 NY Times Magazine piece about Mixed-Bloods / urbanized Natives, and others, “going Native.” I believe the author is mistaken or underinformed about some things, but maybe I’ve been studying it more than he has(!). (NB: The new Circe Sturm book mentioned there doesn’t seem to be out yet: it looks like her research continued longer than expected. [Apparently post-grad research can go on and on!] I get more potentially helpful hits searching not via the then-working title “Claiming Redness,” but the subtitle “Racial and Cultural Politics of Becoming Cherokee.”)
(The Times piece reminds me of how some Mixed-Blood activists / theorists insist on our right to identify as time, place, company, life-stage, etc., sall for. But U.S.-rotted Mixed-Bloods mostly didn’t develope as solid a Metis / Mestizo / Mestico / Mulatto identity as Canada or Latin America have — painful as it may have been going through it for them, constantly ‘between tribes,’ Native and European / African. We should be grateful to them for it.)
Could be. It could be that close.
Danger, Canada, the regressive Conservatives are trending upward! They got you into this mess, do you really think they can, or want to, get you out?! Remember these aren’t good-ol’ Canadian PCs, but Reform/Alliance! Even a real PC in that party is just another MP for Harper! If we can crash the CPC, maybe some kind of arrangement can be made among the Liberals, NDP, Bloc … hey, how about the Greens?!!! After all, minority government is doable … just not by them!! So I guess what I’m saying is STRATEGIC VOTING for any (real) non-Conservative with a chance to win your riding. This one’s too important! Save your Sovereignty, save your economy, save your healthcare, save Confederation, save your rights and freedoms, save a Constitution that’s the envy of the world!
Yes, it’s true, he seems to have a functional, as opposed to dysfunctional, family and marriage!
I’m Orthodox Christian and demand America get over its Eastern-European blindspot. Remember that Orthodox Christians, Eastern Catholics, even eastern Latin Catholics, Muslims, etc., never had a Reformation or Enlightenment, and Modernity was forced on them by Communism (from the West, if you remember!). Rightly or wrongly, ethnicity or tribe or blood or nation (in the old sense) or father- / motherland, even religion, still mean to them what they meant to the West many generations ago.
I’m not saying to let Russia have its way with its neighbors carte blanche, nor vice-versa. But it’s incredibly provocative and foolhardy to tie ourselves to troubles there by Treaty, “the highest law of the land.” It’s bad enough we have Presidents who go to war without a State of War declared by the lawful authority, Congress. But in NATO “an attack against one is an attack against all / us”!!! (Though it’s laughable that WE are the only power to ever activate the North Atlantic Treaty, after 9/11, when we weren’t even attacked by a country. What are we, Luxembourg?) Our first national interest is peace and security; this is increasingly not being served by our post-Cold-War policies. Unless our real “interest” is Russian conquest and Liberalization and Protestantization, Americanization, Westernization, corporatization, Snickerizatsiya.
We need to respect Russia. We need to return to diplomacy, public but also discreet. (Not just “expecting” and shaming and pushing leaders around publicly.) We need competent, non-ideological experts and advisers about parts of the world we’re unfamiliar with … including a depoliticized Intelligence function – “independent,” like the independent judiciary – taken seriously and not just used for partisan, ideological, or corporate purposes. (How about an semi-independent Intelligence Czar like the independent Comptroller General / GAO?) We need Congressional equality, assertiveness, oversight, and expertise. We need to stop insisting that other countries or civilizations or religions become just like us / ours; we need to accept difference in others.* Pluralism, what a concept!
Anyway, who agreed to turn a military alliance into one pushing certain forms of government or economics or religion, or a World Police Force (ie, European / American Police Force!)???
(*–Ironically, the Bible itself and scholars say the sin of Sodom wasn’t homosexuality, but the gang-rape of strangers, like the angels in the Genesis account: “rape as public policy” as I heard one scholar call it. Supposedly the idea was to make the unfamiliar visitor ‘familiar’ and ‘like us.’ Bush “sodomizes” Putin, Kim Jong Il, Saddam, Ahmadinejad…!)
Is a rich, powerful White politician like McCain in any position to tell Congressman John Lewis who does or doesn’t remind him of George Wallace and put him in fear of increased racist violence? Is McCain a mind-reader?
Palin illegally abuses powers in Troopergate and possibly another matter. Isn’t 8 years of abuse of power in the Oval Office enough?! “Political” investigation? Yeah: BOTH parties in Alaska’s Legislature did it! How about her expense-abuse and persecution of rape victims?
Who scares you more in the Oval Office, Palin or Obama, OK?!! At least Obama has Federal, national, and international experience; Palin barely has State-level experience.
A dozen more people for McCain and/or Palin to denounce / repudiate…. And a more poignant look at Palin’s continuing connection with secessionists, from Bobby Kennedy Jr. (The AIP’s citing of the UN Charter and international law is quite laughable to me as a Native American; maybe if it that party wasn’t so White….)
“Palling around with terrorists” charge is racist … against Arabs. I think this is only for the Hard Right “base,” not to flip “independents” or such. So many of them think because Obama has an Arabic name [Named after his father: Can't get much more "family values" than that!!], he’s a Muslim, so the “terrorists” they first think Palin is referring to are Arab / Muslim, not somebody who belonged to a radical American group when Obama was all of eight years old, and went on to become a respected educator. McCain is little help when his audiences call Obama an Arab, acting like “Arab” is an insult or something bad!!! As if Arab men aren’t “family men,” to use McCain’s expression?
A “hockey mom” only briefly, and many years ago? That tells me what she’s doing is a carefuly-crafted false image for sheer political purposes. Many politicians do it, of course, but to pollute a hockey game with it by letting her drop the puck is unforgiveable to hockey fans like me! Of course, pro sports is just another business, teams are corporations.
My mother recently asked me what was the deal with Palin’s “betcha’s” and Slurvian droppin’ of final G’s. Apparently she’s lyin’, pretendin’, and fear-mongerin’. Just what we need, another “acting President“!
“Rage rising on McCain campaign trail,” fear they’ll lose. (Even though we know they’ll steal it again!)
“Negative ads”? “Attack ads”? I think we have to stop equating factual criticism ads with lying, deceiving, or exaggerating ads. I haven’t heard a single truly negative ad for Obama yet. (Although somebody in my house usually mutes them on TV!) OTOH I’ve never heard such a pile of stinking manure as we’re being subjected to from the McCain/Palin camp, so often, so many ways, so constantly.
April 9, the day in 1784 that King George III ratified the Treaty of Paris, effectively granting the 13 provinces (colonies) independence.
The Republicans like to run against Democrats by calling us “tax-and-spend liberals.” They also pretend to fiscal restraint and conservatism, competence and responsibility, supposedly in contrast to us. What’s become clearer to more and more Americans in the last 28 years is just how untrue this all is.
Anybody who gets into power in government has political or financial ‘debts’ to pay, support to buy, punishment to mete out, interests of their own to pursue, maybe even once in a while sincere attempts to do the right thing. We Democrats are supposedly averse to cutting programs – for the rich as well as for the poor – because we’re softies, or usually feel sensitive to cross-aisle criticism with an eye on re-election. In fact Democrats in Congress are frequently brutalized into cutting programs for the poor, rarely for the rich. But when we want to do more, we’re generally honest about the cost, and try to “pay as you go.” It’s cheaper that way: no years of interest piling up. But it’s politically costly unless it’s a ‘home run,’ and national Democrats haven’t hit many of those since the ’60s and ’70s.
Republicans, OTOH, have figured out a neat way to spend what they want. They borrow the money, cynically put the government, ie, you and me, into debt to finance their grand schemes usually for the rich and business, stockholders I mean – certainly not workers who do the work! This may be called BORROW-AND-SPEND. It ingeniously separates the issue of the proposal from the issue of paying for it, by years. And their beneficiaries are very grateful, and show it. Doubt me? Reagan was a master at it; the fact that Clinton left office with a huge surplus was little short of a miracle. But just as fast, W. and Co. have put us back into a deep hole with no bottom in sight.
But surely the chickens come home to roost eventually, you say? So much the better from the Republican perspective. Fiscal crisis makes it politically easier for them to get away with cutting help for the poor, needy, and workers; they’re definitely not softies. Also, by the time crisis comes, all that accumulated debt is just a huge dollar sign, and they can make us forget what it was for. “Certainly we have to pay our debts,” they say, and everybody agrees. “But if we overtax the rich and businesses, they’ll leave us in the lurch.”* And so our already-regressive tax system goes into a higher gear, hitting the poor and workers even more, while their rich, powerful friends remain grateful, and keep on showing it. To add insult to injury, the GOP now gets an undeserved reputation for fiscal restraint and responsibility. IT’S PURE POLITICS, SMOKE AND MIRRORS, BAIT-AND-SWITCH. More recently, they “create facts on the ground,” getting us into wars that benefit mostly nobody but their contractor buddies; now it’s, “We can’t leave that country in a mess, can we?”
There’s a place for borrowing by government: needs such as capital construction or repair or purchase, or emergencies. But Republicans borrow excessively, at least at the federal level. In effect they SPEND-AND-TAX: They tax future generations! That means interest on top of the initial (unworthy) cost.
This habit of theirs actually undermines two foundational principles of English/American democratic government: The people may not be taxed without the consent of their legislative representatives, aka, “Taxation without representation is tyranny**;” and, No legislature may bind a future legislature. Debt-abuse taxes future generations unnecessarily without their advance consent. And it binds future legislatures to tax, to pay for this unnecessary debt. Historically these principles are on a level with the Magna Carta, and ought to be considered more weightily than they have been in recent decades, especially by the GOP as it claims a “conservative” and “small government / anti-government” mantle … unless these too are just blowing smoke.
(*–What an undermining of our sovereignty!! That’s treason!)
(**–Although there are certainly worse forms of tyranny!)
…and on the U.S. political system as a whole (no pun intended). For Palin, see both the mythbusting list on this page and the perceptive Matt Taibbi rant linked from the top of it. Highlights include Abramoff, earmarks, pork, Alaska’s highest taxes, Alaska’s highest federal spending, Wasilla being Alaska’s meth capital, etc.
They also now have up top there the newer issue’s McCain expose. I have to go to bed, but get a load of this just one page one:
…Dramesi, who went on to serve as chief war planner for U.S. Air Forces in Europe and commander of a wing of the Strategic Air Command, was not surprised. “McCain says his life changed while he was in Vietnam, and he is now a different man,” Dramesi says today. “But he’s still the undisciplined, spoiled brat that he was when he went in.”
This is the story of the real John McCain, the one who has been hiding in plain sight. It is the story of a man who has consistently put his own advancement above all else, a man willing to say and do anything to achieve his ultimate ambition: to become commander in chief, ascending to the one position that would finally enable him to outrank his four-star father and grandfather.
In its broad strokes, McCain’s life story is oddly similar to that of the current occupant of the White House. John Sidney McCain III and George Walker Bush both represent the third generation of American dynasties. Both were born into positions of privilege against which they rebelled into mediocrity. Both developed an uncanny social intelligence that allowed them to skate by with a minimum of mental exertion. Both struggled with booze and loutish behavior. At each step, with the aid of their fathers’ powerful friends, both failed upward. And both shed their skins as Episcopalian members of the Washington elite to build political careers as self-styled, ranch-inhabiting Westerners who pray to Jesus in their wives’ evangelical churches.
In one vital respect, however, the comparison is deeply unfair to the current president: George W. Bush was a much better pilot.
Sarah Palin, I hear,* emphasized little else in her debate with Joe Biden last night than how she’s just like the people watching at home. Maybe because she’s not?!!!: a young hot White rural Fundamentalist** businesswoman and petty politician***? America’s alot more diverse than that, and always has been, but Republicans either don’t want to admit that, or want to make us all “petty White Fundamentalist businesspeople.”
In any case, the White House has been run by people “just like us” for 28 years, and look at the mess we’re in. Maybe “people like us” aren’t qualified to be the federal government’s Chief Executive! Maybe what’s important isn’t “who I’d like to have a beer with,” but who’s competent, experienced, leaderly, brave, law-abiding, socially just and compassionate, a smidge of political savvy to get the right thing done, “reality-based,” stuff like that.
(*–I didn’t watch or listen. I find my patience for the drawn-out process is wearing thin. It’s been clear for me what this nation needs since 2000, especially U.S. Constitution Memorial Day: 12/12/00!)
(**–Actually pentecostal, Assemblies of God. Do we have any video or audio of her “speaking in tongues”?! “slain in the Spirit”? — How about that during a national crisis … and while McCain’s post-traumatic under the Lewinsky desk?!!! How about her delivering “a word of prophecy”? At least W. doesn’t claim that when he gets foreign policy directives from the Almighty!!!)
(***–Petty in both senses of the word, clearly and sadly.)
Yes, it’s true. Way back in 1982 Canada ended the pro forma necessity for the Parliament at Westminster (UK) to ratify amendments to its constitutional law. In Canada this is commonly referred to as the patriation of the constitution, ‘bringing it home’ so to speak. This includes the Monarchy, because it is part of Canada’s constitutional system. Therefore, Canada is most clearly no longer ruled by the Sovereign of the UK, but by the Sovereign of Canada. Canada agreed in a way extemely difficult to change, to continue sharing its Monarch, Queen Elizabeth II and her heirs and successors, with other interested countries, such as the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Belize, etc. In fact, Canada freely and democratically adopted the strongest pro-Monarchy constitution in the Commonwealth, stronger even than the UK itself. The fact that Canada’s Monarch is shared, and resides in the UK, diminishes this not one iota, since Her Majesty is represented in Canada federally by the Governor General of Canada, and separately in each province by that province’s Lieutenant-Governor, all appointed on the advice of the democratically-elected federal Ministry, ie, the prime minister. Furthermore, for the last half-century, all Canada’s GGs have been Canadians, not Britons or Australians or anything else.
My headline is a poke at Canada’s few thousand (small-R) republicans, who tend to get disproportionate MSM coverage there (while the Monarchy, the GG, the LGs, and monarchists get very little, usually negative or stereotyped, such as relatively unimportant “gaffes,” or “tea and crumpets” Anglophilia), and who claim to desire to “end constitutional links to Britain” by abolishing Canada’s Monarchy. They clearly either don’t understand Canada’s constitution, or deliberately obfuscate the issue for ulterior motives: Many want to make Canada a clone of the United States (though others claim not to). The fact is that Monarchy vs. Republic is not an issue as far as the general Canadian public cares; they’re content with the status quo. If some MSM “journalist” or pollster asks a leading question like a bad prosecutor, then sure, they think about it, because they’re caring, intelligent people, less likely than Yanks to tell them to do something unpleasant to themselves. But for the Canadian democracy — as opposed to the Canadian (U.S.-influenced) punditocracy — constitutional change of this magnitude is a non-starter. They remember how a whole generation from the mid-1970s to the mid-90s was consumed with constitutional questions, and they just want to get on with normal life.
Do some Canadian politicians want to dump the Queen of Canada and become President? Canadians are wiser to the ways of politicians than most Americans I think, perhaps because they have an option to deny them absolute power: the Monarchy. Even the most powerful politician in Canada is nothing more than Her Majesty’s Canadian chief servant or advisor; “The Executive Government and Authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen” (Constitution Act 1867, paragraph 9 [formerly known as the original British North America Act that created the Canadian confederation out of 4 UK colonies]).
So it’s true, Canada has ended constitutional links to Britain … as of 1982. In fact, HM came to Ottawa and signed it herself!
PS: I wonder if at least some who oppose Prince Charles succeeding his mother perceive her as having been weaker than some of her recent male predecessors, whereas His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales is well-known for having definite opinions that call into question the accumulation of power — to society’s detriment — by politicians, businesspeople, ideologues, gratuitous anti-traditionalists, even ‘regressive’ pseudo-traditionalists, and such. I certainly don’t agree with everything HRH has said or done publicly or personally, but he does strike me as sometimes a real ‘progressive conservative,’ or Red Tory in Canadian terms!
Also the Serb attacks on Albanian Muslims in Kosovo, and is provoking a ‘Polish Missile Crisis’? According to Noam Chomsky here. Even that the Georgia war was timed by the Bushies to help McCain show-off his (fake, like his maverick status) foreign policy expertise?
Meanwhile is Chomsky’s premonition of Russian forces in the Caribbean about to come true after all, via Chavez’ Venezuela, also Bushie-provoked?
And why is every little troublemaking country all of a sudden a U.S. “ally,” according to the Bushies and MSM? The Defense Department informs me that America’s only official allies in all the world are the members of NATO: “The official allies of the United States can be found on the NATO website at http://www.nato.int/structur/index.html.” No Georgia, no Israel, no Saudi Arabia, no Jordan, no Iraq, no Afghanistan, no Pakistan, no Ukraine, no Colombia, not even Japan or South Korea or Taiwan or Australia or New Zealand or Palau….
And does the Iran/Contra/October Surprise conspiracy/coverup continue at/above the highest levels of our Constitutional, official government, a generation later?! Do they even explain the Sarah Palin nomination, and even the W. nomination and the Wall Street Mess and who knows what else??? (Two-part series at Counterpunch: Read the article linked from the linked article first, since Part I doesn’t link to Part II, only the other way around.)