MY reason is I’m tired of the W. abuses of power and neutered or compromised Congresses’ lax oversight, and compromised Republican courts.
The dirty little secret is that usually the party out of power Federally favors States’ Rights where they ARE in power, or hope to use to regain power, and opposed by the party IN power Federally that wants to impose its will nationally, and finds it easier to do so through one government than 50, 51, or 52! They don’t always use the language of States’ Rights, though. Because the phrase has been tainted by racists, slaveholders, and Confederates, I prefer State Sovereignty — an absolute value under the current Constitution.
I’ve admired the late Marc Chaitlin, but he underestimated the need for State Sovereignty. Suffice to say he passed away during W.’s first 100 days. It’s possible to see our States today as Chaitlin’s mere “state-like provinces,” and as theologian Stanley Hauerwas might say, there’s no denying the descriptive power of that statement. But we need to restore States’ dignity as a hedge against Federal dictatorship like we’ve experienced now, or worse in the future. Certainly not to roll back true progressive improvements in America, or give greater power to reactionary elements among State and local politicians … indeed, to protect or restore those improvements, and make them even better! Actually I think most Americans today think of States as little more than provinces, pointless holdovers from somewhere around the Middle Ages, with non-understood differences in drinking or driving laws, court systems, governmental structures, tax structures, practices — Patriots’ Day? Freeholders? I&R? California Emission? But all this proves is the need to fix Civics classes, and educate pundits and journalists also. (While we’re at it, let’s teach about the legal status of Native American Tribes, and their rights and Reservations / Villages also.)